> From: Jakob Hirsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I understand that, I've been long enough in this business. I > just wanted to know with which servers the behaviour > described by you happens.
Specifically it was older Novell Groupwise servers, though adding the AUTH= line after the AUTH line aparrently broke an old sendmail server. > You wrote that the bogus authenticator didn't fix the > behaviour, so this wouldn't be a question of elegance. > Applying non-trivial patches is far less elegant than a > little config change. It fixed some of the remote servers, I just consider coding up a non required authenticator to subvert an MTA into producing a required response less elegant than having the MTA software support it natively. Patch or otherwise. -Andy- -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
