On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 17:35 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:10:14AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > 
> > Cute idea, but I don't like the implementation much -- it would be
> > better for it to be available in a general fashion from ACLs.
> 
> I looked at that first.  However, since (AFAICT) the ACL system works in a
> accept/reject/defer logic, my understanding was that a fourth command would 
> had
> to be added to the underlying code specificaly for this feature.  Is this
> appreciation correct? 

I was thinking of 

deny condition = foo
     message = User not local and use you SPF. Try <$addr>
     errorcode = 551

-- 
dwmw2


-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details 
at http://www.exim.org/ ##

Reply via email to