Robert Millan wrote: > I looked at that first. However, since (AFAICT) the ACL system works in a > accept/reject/defer logic, my understanding was that a fourth command would > had > to be added to the underlying code specificaly for this feature. Is this > appreciation correct?
This could be done by extending the control modifier, e.g. deny message = User not local; please try <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> control = redirect but then you could also do it more generaly, e.g. "reject control = code=551" The (IMHO) better way would be to extend the redirect router, i.e. instead of ":fail: user moved away" there would be ":redirect: try [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Is the forward file used during recipient verify? This would be necessary, but I'm not sure about that right now. Another question: Which MTAs handle 551 and send to the new address? -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
