Hi,
(started a new thread as this has nothing to do with the original one)
> In that case, how about ${spam_score_int}0 ? (With a suitable adjustment
> as to what you are comparing it with, of course.)
That should actually work. I don't mean to bother you, but are you not
concerned that such an incompatible change could probably many others?
Something else... since the upgrade, this appears sporadically in my
spamd log:
> spamd: bad protocol: header error: (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 0
> bytes, got 44 bytes)
and, as a consequence, in the exim log:
> spam acl condition: cannot parse spamd output
Needless to say, the message has more than 0 bytes. That's most probably
related to the changes in spool_mbox.c. Nico?
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details
at http://www.exim.org/ ##
