Philip Hazel wrote: >>> spamd: bad protocol: header error: (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 0 >>> bytes, got 44 bytes) >> and, as a consequence, in the exim log: >>> spam acl condition: cannot parse spamd output >> Needless to say, the message has more than 0 bytes. That's most probably >> related to the changes in spool_mbox.c. Nico? > > I did take a brief look at Nico's patch, but not in detail, as I trust > Nico. Are you there Nico?
I've just checked my own logfiles, but the error never occured here, but I'll have a look. Nico -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
