------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=458 ------- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-07 15:45 ------- On Wednesday 07 February 2007 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > As far as I can see, it *does* always call parse_extract_address(). It does? Where? When testing, I get: > ${if match_address {"Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 16:38:12 30499 expanding: "Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16:38:12 30499 result: "Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16:38:12 30499 expanding: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16:38:12 30499 result: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16:38:12 30499 address match: subject="magnus holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16:38:12 30499 lysator.liu.se> in "lysator.liu.se"? no (end of list) 16:38:12 30499 "Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? no (end of list) 16:38:12 30499 condition: match_address {"Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 16:38:12 30499 result: false 16:38:12 30499 expanding: yes 16:38:12 30499 result: yes 16:38:12 30499 skipping: result is not used 16:38:12 30499 expanding: no 16:38:12 30499 result: no 16:38:12 30499 expanding: ${if match_address {"Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 16:38:12 30499 result: no no It doesn't work better the other way around either. > I far prefer the solution of finding a way of converting RFC2822 address > lists rather than having foranyaddress, etc. However, I think the name > "addresses" is too ambiguous. I think something like ${address_list:xxxxx} > would be clearer. I'm thinking about putting that in. I concur. address_list was that Kjetil T. Homme suggested. But isn't "addresslist" better, considering the "historical mis-design"? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
