------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=458 ------- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-07 16:29 ------- On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ------- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-07 15:45 ------- > On Wednesday 07 February 2007 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > As far as I can see, it *does* always call parse_extract_address(). > > It does? Where? When testing, I get: > > > ${if match_address {"Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Did I misunderstand? I though you were talking about ${address: No, I didn't misunderstand. This is what you wrote: Hmmm, would it hurt too much if ${address: ...} always called parse_extract_address()? Obviously it causes a little bit of overhead when it wasn't needed. As far as match_address goes, I don't see why one would ever want to supply a full RFC2822 address. > I concur. address_list was that Kjetil T. Homme suggested. But isn't > "addresslist" better, considering the "historical mis-design"? I don't think I really mind, though "addresslist" is already an Exim technical term, so might be misunderstood. I had considered something like "regularize_address_list", but that's too long, and "fix_address_list" is vague. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
