On 24/06/2008, Andrew Nimmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Nigel Metheringham > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we have hit a stage where effectively no work is being done on > > exim - the bugzilla queue is increasing, but very few of them are > > being touched at all. > > > > If this remains like this it might be as well to admit the current > > state of things and arrange the funeral. > > > > Nigel. > > > At the risk of getting no replies due to overwork, and perhaps raising > an issue which has already been discussed albeit in a different form, > would anyone like to consider the creation of an 'exim foundation'? I > won't list what its responsibilities could be, nor its structure, but > the model already exists elsewhere. I'd be interested in being > involved although, like everyone else here, clearly not in a full-time > capacity.
Well it's a bit hard to say whether I'd support it or not since you deliberately don't say what it would consist of or what it would do.... -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/peeebeee -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
