------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=927




--- Comment #12 from Phil Pennock <[email protected]>  2009-12-10 23:55:12 
---
@Andreas ~#11:
So there are two patches, the second marked the first obsolete and was posted
an hour later.

In the second patch, the definition of SIGNAL_BOOL was instead placed in exim.h
after <signal.h> was included.

So either you applied the first patch, which would also break local_scan
compilation, or your platform does not define sig_atomic_t when <signal.h> is
included.  If the latter, can you let me know which is the correct header on
your platform, please?

Thanks,
-Phil


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

-- 
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details 
at http://www.exim.org/ ##

Reply via email to