------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1066 --- Comment #9 from Andrey N. Oktyabrski <[email protected]> 2011-01-13 12:54:00 --- (In reply to comment #7) > [original response discarded; Graeme pointed to the retry rules; I'll just > note > that you're looking for "32.5 Retry rules for specific errors" in The Spec] This is not inside the smtp session. > I do not think we should hard-code something in the way this patch does. I'd > be happier if we had something like the ACL language for dealing with outbound > connections, so that the admin could script the response. > > I think that an SMTP transport option of "upgrade_rcpt_4xx_to_5xx" which is an > expanded string yielding a boolean and which gets the rcpt response line in a > variable would be a good choice. Let the admins upgrade, make sure we log > hard > that the response was upgraded. Also include a variable which contains the > SMTP banner text. > > upgrade_rcpt_4xx_to_5xx = ${if and{\ > {match{$remote_banner}{\N\bPostfix\b\N}}\ > {or{\ > {match{$rcpt_response_text}{\N^Recipient address rejected: User > unknown\N}}\ > {eq{$rcpt_response_text}{unknown user account}}}}} {yes}{no}} > > As is evident, this is contentious and not everyone would agree, but I'd be > prepared to argue in favour of submitting such a feature. Yes, this way is true. I agree with it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
