------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1066 --- Comment #15 from Graeme Fowler <[email protected]> 2011-01-16 13:41:33 --- (In reply to comment #14) > If this feature will be implemented, then the complementary > "downgrade_rcpt_5xx_to_4xx" needed too. Because the "5xx Over Quota" response > happens not once nor twice. It is not violates the standard, but when I have > large mailing list and wish to delete dead addresses from it automatically, I > prefer the 4xx responses for the temporary errors same as "Over Quota". Pardon me for having a good old laugh about this now :-D So we've gone from a single-barrel to a double-barrel way of being able to blow your own feet off. I'm not willing to accept either of these requests (as I have previously explained). What next - a switch to mangle 2xx responses? As I already wrote, RFC5321 states that the codes should be honoured and the text informational. You're asking for a massive change to that trust model. Graeme -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
