On 2012-05-17 at 15:57 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > Phil Pennock wrote: > > Am really coming around to the idea of making the next release be 4.80 > > instead of 4.78, to highlight that there are issues to watch for here. > > There do seem to be a number of changes that cause upgrade issues, > so probably a good idea.
Done. I really dislike being the originator of backwards incompatible changes, but both the real ones are security fixes: OpenSSL not susceptible to BEAST in default config, GnuTLS not supporting MD5. The accept_8bitmime change, I think everyone's roughly in agreement on. If anyone disagrees, please do speak up. -Phil -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
