On 2012-05-17 15:36, Phil Pennock wrote:
One stance is that it's a case where maintaining backwards compatibility is bad, because that is being deliberately broken to improve security.Thoughts?
In favour of not maintaining back-compat on this point. -- Jeremy -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
