On 2012-05-18 at 18:32 +0200, Marcin Mirosław wrote: > Could it be problem founded by clang analyzer[1]? After applying your > patch those report disappear from scan result, this is why i suspect > clang analyzer found real problem. I appreciative feedback if clang > anaylze was correct or wrong.
It was correct. I put a bunch of work (March 2011) into 4.76 to improve Exim's clang compatibility and to clean up a bunch of bits where the coding style had led to many compiler warnings. So we're getting better here. -Phil -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
