W dniu 2012-05-18 21:33, Phil Pennock pisze: > On 2012-05-18 at 18:32 +0200, Marcin Mirosław wrote: >> Could it be problem founded by clang analyzer[1]? After applying your >> patch those report disappear from scan result, this is why i suspect >> clang analyzer found real problem. I appreciative feedback if clang >> anaylze was correct or wrong. > > It was correct. > > I put a bunch of work (March 2011) into 4.76 to improve Exim's clang > compatibility and to clean up a bunch of bits where the coding style had > led to many compiler warnings. So we're getting better here.
Thanks for answer. May i ask for another review? This reports are commented in the same way as report about dcc: "Stack address stored into global variable" http://mejor.pl/exim-4.77/report-IORFNM.html#EndPath http://mejor.pl/exim-4.77/report-thpTB0.html#EndPath http://mejor.pl/exim-4.77/report-kWMaKG.html#EndPath I wonder if it could lead to any problem like it was in src/dcc.c ? Thanks again, Marcin -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
