------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1411 Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> 2013-11-06 20:51:42 --- You are correct, and cutthrough is incompatible with adding any headers after the point of receiving the header/body boundary. This is because we are copying incoming bytes verbatim to the outbound. Both data and dkim ACLs are affected. At the very least this a documentation lack, and we should probably issue warning lag messages. Header-removal ditto. Note that a data-ACL deny is reasonable; although it wastes transmission effort and the outbound peer's cpu, the connection is terminated without an SMTP-level end-of-data mark so the mail is not transferred there. I'm loath to do similar on discovery that a header-add was requested in the data ACL. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
