https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400
Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.exim.org/show_ | |bug.cgi?id=410 --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> --- Another possibility might be some form of option syntax, and a explicit shutdown=no (with yes being the default) somewhere in the expansion. The "inet" connect spec would take options after another colon, but we couldn't really do that for unix-domain connects. We could accept options after the word "readsocket" - though this expansion item would we the first ever to do it, I think the current parsing does not preclude it. The advantage over the "negative timeout" version is that we can invent other options at a later date; it's more flexible. Cf. Bug 410 which requests a UDP variant of readsocket. I don't feel we should special-case port 80. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
