On 19/12/2018 00:51, Phil Pennock via Exim-dev wrote:
> I think this change is generally useful, in having a cleaner setup for a
> very common use-case, and showing exactly where new macros should be
> defined, which can reduce some of the pain encountered by newcomers to
> Exim.

The wording "should be" could be relaxed slightly, maybe, since it isn't
required by Exim's parsing.  "It is simplest to", perhaps?

I see you quietly removed prdr.  Has it been seen to cause problems?

On multi_domain - some really stupid hosts (hi, Google!) can't handle
it, and will _always_ temp-reject any RCPT after the first domain
(G gives an explicit text error saying it can't hack it).


## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim 
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##

Reply via email to