https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3024
--- Comment #7 from Jeremy Harris <jgh146...@wizmail.org> --- I've mulled that suggestion over for a while - and finally got to a killer: it doesn't fix every case. Eventually someone will find a need to wrap one reduce inside another, and use the "outer" $value (or equiv) within the "inner" operation. No, I've not thought of why it would be wanted! However... That gets me started thinking of access to a stack of $value - perhaps $value1 for the immediately-wrapping layer, $value2 for the next one out, etc. Some amount of programming effort to implement, but feels feasible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-dev.lists.exim.org/ ## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account): ## exim-dev-unsubscr...@lists.exim.org ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/