On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 17:12 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:42:52 +0100, Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
> >IMHO the SQL back-end is more flexible than the filesystem because it > >will handle arbitrary 'virtual' users, as long as you can send in a > >'username' in the 'spam=' line. > > And there is no in-between like telling spamd where to put the > database in the file system? So I have to choose between local unix > accounts and having a fully-fledged database? I guess you don't have to have fully-fledged unix users who login, just entries in /etc/passwd or your local equivalent with home directories so that ~/.spamassassin goes somewhere.... I don't see any way of substituting anything into the 'bayes_path' configuration item in SA other than using the ~/ hack. Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 1296 768003 VoIP: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
