Dave Lugo wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Philip Hazel wrote: > > > > However, if you want to *block* the message on a per-user basis you will > > have difficulty because a message may have multiple users with different > > requirements. This problem has been discussed on the list several times > > (it also applies to, for example, different spam scanning requirements). > > > > There is No Easy Answer. The problem is caused by the way SMTP works. > > > Blocking using per user prefs before DATA isn't terribly difficult, > it's when you start rejecting at end-of-DATA that it gets to the > No Easy Answer.
How about a fake reject in data acl if some users do not want the message and some do that states the users who the message did not get delivered to? I haven't thought it out enough to know if it's a good idea or not. And of course some servers/clients will butcher the message to mean something else. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals Got Gas??? -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
