On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Marco Gaiarin wrote: > > and AFA i've understood with no_verify i skip the verification for this > router, or... hem... could i be so stupid? ;)
no_verify means that the router is skipped when verifying the address. If no router matches when verifying an address then the address is considered to be invalid. > verify mean only that this router are passed when in address > verification mode, so simply i skip the only router could match? I think that's correct (if I have understood you). The only time you want to use no_verify is if you need to do something different when verifying as opposed to when delivering. This is almost never necessary. When it is necessary, you usually have a pair of routers: one with no_verify that handles delivery, and another which handles the same addresses at verification time. The second router usually has verify_only set. For example, in the default configuration the userforward router is skipped during verification because it requires special privilege to run, and Exim is not privileged at verification time. However verification still works for userforward addresses because the localuser router can also handle these addresses. The localuser router does not have verify_only set because it also acts as a fallback router for users without a .forward file. Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
