wrote: > Ian FREISLICH schrieb: > > thanks for pointing this out. I forgot to mention this. Of course this > is much more easy, but only works if you want to deny based on SA's > result. If you want to tag the mail for further processing, you have to > stick with the long version I posted, because defers in warn acl > statements pass the control flow to the next acl statement.
Or, you can do as I do which is to set required_score to 30 or some really high value where you're confident you won't have FPs and do processing as you suggest on the values in between. Ian -- Ian Freislich -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
