On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Bill Hacker wrote: > > Upstream connectivity providers that block port 25 often *cannot* open it. > > The law of the land (federal/national) in some jurisdictions, requires > subscribers to > send only over the ISP's facilities. One neck on the block when > tracking down abuse. >
Eh.. can you provide an example of such a jurisdiction? While I'll agree port 25 blocks may be appropriate depending on the customer base, this is the first of heard of their being legally mandated. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Dave Lugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] LC Unit #260 TINLC Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks. -------------------------------------------------------- Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
