* Jeroen van Wolffelaar: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 05:21:20PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Marc Sherman: >> > Or should the additional section not be trusted at all? >> >> This is probably the safest approach, and it's also necessary to >> comply with the letter of the SMTP RFC. The resolver can drop as many >> data as it wishes from the additional section. >> >> It would increase the number of DNS queries by quite a bit, though. > > Not so much if first all of the additional section is tried, and extra > queries only been done of all of those fail
This would require a significant change in how Exim handles routing (part of the routing would run after the a delivery attempt has been performed). I doubt it's worth the complexity. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
