On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:06:12 +0100, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >They don't provide Perfect Forwarding Secrecy, so they don't need >cryptographically strong random numbers. I think using PFS is a >mistake in this context (because it's too costly, as you've noted), >but the last time this has come up on debian-devel, the consensus was >that PFS is important to warrant this inconvenience.
Florian, if you are not dreaming, point me to that conversation on -devel. PFS has never been explicitly mentioned in the discussions there. How do I disable PFS for exim4 linked with GnuTLS? Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
