On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 11:00 +0100, Sander Smeenk wrote: > What is the opinion of the masses, am I right to reject mail to return > paths if they don't come from <> or postmaster?
Yes, technically you're probably right -- those callouts are broken. But you probably don't lose much by accepting them either. The reverse-path addresses are time-limited anyway; they're not going to be getting much spam. The important part is that you reject MAIL FROM:<> to your 'raw' address. Rejecting mail with non-empty reverse-path to your signed addresses isn't really that important, so if it's a problem you might as well relax the checking. It's worth reporting the problem to the offending sites though. -- dwmw2 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
