Tony Finch wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, W B Hacker wrote: > >> From inspection of the archive, I think I see the sort of problem it is >>causing for those with less thread-aware MUA's, and am happy to fix >>that. > > > Boggle! How do you expect a thread-aware MUA to deal with your messages > sensibly when they have no thread information at all? Let alone "less" > thread-aware MUAs. > > Tony.
As in the screenshot: http://conducive.org/threading.tiff Where's the beef? And, again, will someone kindly tell me what headers leave alone so as to help *others*? Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
