On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, W B Hacker wrote: > Tony Finch wrote: > > > > Boggle! How do you expect a thread-aware MUA to deal with your > > messages sensibly when they have no thread information at all? Let > > alone "less" thread-aware MUAs. > > As in the screenshot: http://conducive.org/threading.tiff
There's no threading there. That's just sorting by subject with some bogus scaffolding on the left-hand-side. Note that you don't have more than one level of nesting, as (for example) the pipermail archive does. See how Pine shows it, with nesting: http://dotat.at/graphics/pine.png In particular see how the "ACL to reject spam" and MailScanner threads have a structure that your screenshot doesn't show, and how the structure of various threads has been flattened by your replies. > And, again, will someone kindly tell me what headers leave alone so as > to help *others*? You have been told several times. http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060710/msg00114.html http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060710/msg00121.html http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060710/msg00125.html RFC 2822 section 3.6.4. References and In-Reply-To. Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
