W B Hacker wrote: > > Ancient history now. Like it or not, we should move on and use 587.
That's all well and good, Bill, and if you simply advised people not to open port 465 at all, I wouldn't reply. It's your repeated advise to people to open 465 for unencrypted/STARTTLS usage, against all established historical practice, to which I object. - Marc -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
