On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:14:26AM +0100, Philip Hazel wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Steven Wayne wrote: > > > > Oh, one second thing: > > > Exim also said: "(result of an earlier callout reused)". But RFC 2821 > > > says (section 4.5.4.1, Par. 9): "More significantly, 5yz responses to > > > the MAIL command MUST NOT be cached.". Hmmm. > > > > > > > I found that interesting, has anyone got anything further to say about it? > > Only that 2821 is talking about mail delivery, not callouts. > Ah, I wasn't aware the RFCs would differentiate, nor did I look it up myself.
Well I am on holiday this week. Steven. -- While having never invented a sin, I'm trying to perfect several. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
