John Robinson wrote: > On 22/09/2006 00:00, Steve Sobol wrote: > >>On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, John Robinson wrote: >> >>>Yes, it's possible, and it's not too hard, but with the config change I >>>suggested before you wouldn't need to. >> >> >> >>>You sound as if you'd rather not change your config at all, but Exim's >>>relatively easy to configure, so why not? >> >>Because, I quote: >> >>"Well, you could just >> deny domains = those_domains >> !hosts = +allowed_hosts >> >>but if I understand correctly, that would also stop accepting mail for >>those_domains from any relay_from_hosts or authenticated users, which >>may not be the desired effect." >> >>Yes, I need to accept connections from authenticated users. > > > Sorry, I meant my earlier suggestions, in my 8:26pm message: > http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060918/msg00085.html > > The idea there didn't suffer from the same problems. > > [...] > >>I can tell there's stuff being sent directly to Exim; > > [...] > > OK, fair enough, sounds like you really do need this, but it wouldn't > always be necessary, and perhaps it probably won't in another couple of > weeks once the last remnants of DNS cacheing settle down and go away. > > Cheers, > > John. >
Wish a 'coule of weeks' woudl do. Some of the vermin hard-wire stuff in place and/or chase 'A' records. I've had a few that chase domains gone out of any public mx records 2 and 3 *years* ago, or that never had an mx record in the first instance. Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
