Marc Perkel wrote: > > W B Hacker wrote: > >>Marc Perkel wrote: >> >> >> >>>I'm having problems with my spam filtering servers getting listed on >>>UCEPROTECT and can't figure out why. Is anyone familiar with how this >>>blacklist works and what I need to do to not get listed? >>> >> >>It is explained on their website. >> >> >> >>>They seem to hate sender verification - but I'm not going to give that >>>up. >>> >> >>Many folks treat a sender-verify callout as a probe. >>Many more don't respond in a useful or timely way. >> >>We *have* given it up. >> >> > > > Bill, I'm still using sender verification but it's very targeted and > extremely effective. For me to block with verification the server has to > let me get to the rctp to: level and affirmatively tell me that the user > doesn't exist. It's something I'm not giving up. >
Hopefully you are 'weighting' the result (we did...), as an all/nothing test will otherwise create more than a few FP's, even if adjusted for time delays. Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
