Renaud Allard wrote: > Excuse me from sending this to the list, but if Bill could explain what > this means, that would be great. The SMTP error message is not going to > help me find out why the mail has been rejected.
In this case, it is not *intended* to do so... - read on..... > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender > Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:28:15 +0200 > From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > SMTP error from remote mail server after DATA: > host mail.conducive.org [203.194.153.81]: 550 RFC violations exceed > recipient-specific permissions > Fair question. Our error messages *might not* be specific if the nature of our tests turned up things that classified the source as a probable spammer or 'probe'. Your specific server had been so classified here 27 September 2006 for sending to a non-existent address that was clearly intentionally 'constructed', not a mis-spelling of a valid user. Software currently in beta test should give different results when rolled-out in another week or two. Will advise the R&D server info at that time if you'd like to test. Meanwhile, I've pulled that entry. HTH, Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
