On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Ian Eiloart wrote: > > So, if I stopped doing callouts, and chose to bounce spam instead, that > wouldn't be a backward step? You'd be no more unhappy for me to fill your > mailboxes with bounced spam than you are about my callouts? >
You _could_ instead reject at end-of-DATA. The result is: no callout performed, and it was really spam, the connecting trojan/infection is unlikely to bounce the item back to the forged sender. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Dave Lugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] LC Unit #260 TINLC Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks. -------------------------------------------------------- Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
