--On 18 October 2006 22:06:40 +0800 W B Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stuart Gall wrote: > >> Hello >> Is the random callout negative reply cached so that in future >> callouts only the sender is checked ? The docs don't say. >> Which cache ? >> >> Stuart. >> > > Dunno what you mean. Wrong thread maybe? The "random" callout is a callout using Exim's "random" parameter. That's what generates addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] Which is what this thread is about. > We don't do callouts in particular or 'random' anything in general ... > unless Bushmill's malt is involved... > > Bill -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
