David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 01:55 +0800, W B Hacker wrote:
>
>>The only other 'legit' hit besides Renee's that was apparent was
>>Odhiambo Washington's server.
>
>
> You missed at least one.
>
If you mean the one you posted from, no - that was in the LBL for other reasons.
;-)
Back last July we were still trying sender verify and you were experimenting at
that time with SRS with a 4-mile-long munged address.
For whatever reason, that was failing sender verify.
Old config, long-since changed, here, but an old copy on the Zurich server has:
warn
!verify = sender/defer_ok/callout=10s,defer_ok
and some acl_c(x) that carried scores for later disposition. The BL are only
one
part of the scoring system.
May have been the 10s timeout, though I don't see SRS on your recent traffic -
Best,
Bill
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
