Chris Lightfoot wrote: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:39:26AM +0800, W B Hacker wrote: >> Chris Lightfoot wrote: >> >>> Therefore there must be, in the opinion of the people >>> responsible, some feature of dynamic IPs which makes it >>> impossible that mail originating from them is desirable to >>> receive. >> >> Yup. >> >> A ratio of better than a million to one criminally generated to >> innocently generated traffic. > > again, this is the answer to a different question, but > since you actually appear to have data I'd be very > interested to see it! Most people who quote numbers in > this area do so simply by counting the mail they've > blocked, rather than by a proper audit. >
I was taught a long time ago never to get down on the floor and engage in arguments with fools, no matter how well-spoken they seemed. They have been fools longer and better than I have, they are damn good at it, and they will always beat me if I play *their* game. No takers! Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
