Ian Eiloart wrote: > Well, I think that there are spam filters that are more reliable than > humans at detecting spam. That is; the spam filters get fewer false > positives. >
I agree. Especially if it's a lot of messages. If you open up your mailbox and there's 1000 messages of only 50 are good then you'll probably delete several good emails by hand. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
