On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 16:08 +0000, Miles Sabin wrote: > I noticed that you've disabled sa-exim in recent Exim spec files. I know > that sa-exim has mostly been superceded by exim ACLs, but there's one > feature which I don't think can easily be replicated: the ability to > use SpamAssassin's report_safe option to have spam delivered as an > attachment with the report as the primary message body. > > Would you consider reinstating sa-exim? Or can you point me to somewhere > documenting how to get the same effect with exim ACLs (which doesn't > involve passing spam through SA twice or me having to write security- > critical transport filter scripts)?
I'm not entirely averse to reinstating sa-exim if it can still do things that Exim alone cannot. It should be fairly easy for you to build it yourself still, too -- it's only one #define in the specfile. Normally I'd take your corollary as a challenge but I'm not coherent enough for that today -- I've cc'd the exim-users list in the hope that someone there can provide an example. Btw, your 'X-Spam-Report' header is also including a copy of the whole mail body, which probably isn't what you intend. -- dwmw2 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
