Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On Friday 24 November 2006 15:08, Wakko Warner wrote:
> > Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> > > Here is some blueprint how you could try it:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > warn
> > > add_header = X-SECRET-Importance: 4711
> > >
> > > And later in the transport (I'm using the amavis transport here, because
> > > all incoming messages have to pass it):
> > >
> > > amavis:
> > > driver = ...
> > > headers_remove = Importance
> > > headers_add = Importance: $h_x-secret-importance
> >
> > I did not want to have to do it that way. The setup I have, depending on
> > if the user is local or in sql, or if they have a .procmailrc or not,
> > depends on which router handles it and which transport handles it. That
> > sounds like I'd have to dupicate it 4 times.
>
> Better do it in the system filter then.
>
> if first_delivery and ${if def:h_x-secret-importance:} then
> headers remove Importance
> headers add "Importance: $h_x-secret-importance:"
> headers remove X-SECRET-Importance
> endif
This is what I thought might have to be done; I just didn't want to have to
do it that way. I'm not very familiar with the filter structure in exim (I
have avoided it in the past). Does the acl_m* and/or acl_c* variables show
up in a filter? This would seem like a better way to pass this information
to the filter.
--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
Got Gas???
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
