On 13/12/06, Dave Lugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Peter Bowyer wrote: > > > > > > So what happens when the remote server tries to do a verify on your > > > verification. > > > And fails, because it's return verify never found a valid 'mail from'... > > > > That's (one of the reasons) why sender verification is best done (if > > at all) with a null sender - which is Exim's default. > > > > Yeah - so it can break when confronted with BATV. :-/ > > (I'm not a fan of sender verification, but if you do it, you need > to be prepared to fallback to a non-null mail_from.)
Not sure I understand - if this breaks BATV, then so do bounces - I know of some powerful arguments against sender verification, but I didn't think this was one of them.... Of course I may have missed something. Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
