On 03/01/07, Wakko Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been searching for information about why it is a good idea to use 587 > instead of 25 but have not found anything convincing. I have hit a brick > wall where I work since they think that 587 is non-standard (Even after > showing them RFC 4409) and thus is not wise. Can anyone provide me with any > links or anything that would argue this case? Unfortunately, email archives > are not valid for this.
If a standards-track RFC won't convince them, what level of documentation are they looking for? Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
