On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 21:52 +0000, Peter Bowyer wrote: > On 07/01/07, Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > what's the point? these providers should block port 25 instead. the > > providers who don't care to block that port, won't bother to register > > their networks in PBL either. > > Not true - very many already have. I've promoted zen.spamhaus.org > above my other DNSBLs and its not letting a lot through. I check > dynablock.njabl.org and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net later in that order; njabl > is getting very few hits now.
okay, perhaps it makes sense, but their claim that it is Policy Based is not true. I was surprised to find one of our C-nets in the PBL, this was certainly not added by us, and our terms of use do not prohibit the use of port 25. -- Kjetil T. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
