On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Philip Hazel wrote: > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Matthew Hodgson wrote: > >> Might there be any way in the future to make $pipe_addresses inspectable >> within string expansions in a transport? > > The right name would be $recipients, I think. ($pipe_addresses does > magic things, putting each address into a separate argument for the > pipe.)
Isn't $recipients already used to describe the recipients on the initial submitted envelope, rather than those which finally get passed in a batch to a transport? I can already get at the original $recipients by assigning it to an $acl_m variable in an ACL (acl_check_predata or acl_check_nonsmtp). > Please submit this to Bugzilla as a wish list item so that it doesn't > get forgotten. Are there any technical limitations as to why accessing the addr array of address_items as passed to deliver.c:deliver_local() couldn't be accessed directly as a variable rather than only through the $pipe_addresses magic in transport.c:transport_set_up_command()? If not, then I might have a shot at writing a patch. Thanks for the response :) M. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
