On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Matthew Hodgson wrote: > Isn't $recipients already used to describe the recipients on the initial > submitted envelope, rather than those which finally get passed in a batch > to a transport?
Yes, but at present it is not defined in a transport. It is only defined in a system filter and in ACLs. So I thought it kind of made sense to use the same name in a transport. But for less ambiguity, a new name could be invented; $transport_recipients, perhaps? > Are there any technical limitations as to why accessing the addr array of > address_items as passed to deliver.c:deliver_local() couldn't be accessed > directly > as a variable rather than only through the $pipe_addresses magic in > transport.c:transport_set_up_command()? If not, then I might have a shot > at writing a patch. I don't think there's any problem with it. Somehow the list would have to be made available to the expansion functions. -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
