Hello, Anyone know if there is a reason why sender verification should fail with BATV addresses? We don't use BATV ourselves, but have received a report from a user that they were not receiving certain mail messages. It seems that the sender address, batv signed, was not passing the sender verification check.
A simple test to the sending host on port 25 gave this output (some of it deliberately mangled to hide certain info): ============================================= telnet mailgw1.kongsberg.com 25 Trying 193.71.180.98... Connected to mailgw1.kongsberg.com (193.71.180.98). Escape character is '^]'. 220 KONGSBERG secure smtp receiver helo jh.asx.plymouth.ac.uk 250 OK mail from: <> 250 OK rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 501 This system is not configured to relay mail (r) to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for 141.163.18.143 quit 221 kongsberg.com closing Connection closed by foreign host. ============================================= Is this the sending server being misconfigured, or it objecting to the sender verification for some reason? Regards, John. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +44 (0)1752 233839 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
