Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On Wednesday 07 February 2007 16:37, Philip Hazel wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Renaud Allard wrote: >>>> I think it'll be tricky to pick a single "verb" that will convey the >>>> effect it has without potential confusion. >> That is becoming quite clear! >> >> Given that this is a "condition", I suppose we could call it "true", but >> then I suppose we would also need "false". Hmm. Maybe that would be >> useful? >> >>> What about nullexpand ? >> or "justexpand" > > I don't think it matters what it's called. Users will have to read the manual > to find it anyway - it's not something you can simply guess.
Ha! That really did make my morning :) You know perfectly well that no one reads the manual before posting some stupid question on here :P -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
