On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 13:13 +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Do we need git or is Subversion fine? In any case I agree that CVS > must die.
Subversion is largely pointless, as far as I can tell. It has a few _minor_ improvements over CVS but nowhere near enough to justify the upheaval. I'd suggest that the realistic choices would be git or cvs. -- dwmw2 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
