On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:11:55PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On Wednesday 14 February 2007 12:51, Renaud Allard wrote: > > This is a _new_ mail sent from the internal server (192.168.100.12) from > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using exim 4.66 as a mail > > relay between the internal server and the internet. > > > > As we can see, a first attempt is made on the primary MX: SMTP1, it gets > > a 450 error for greylisting. Quite obviously exim retries to SMTP2 and > > also gets a 450 error. But exim never retries and interprets this as a > > permanent error. > > This may be another instance of the address_retry_include_sender bug, > introduded in 4.64 and fixed in CVS: > > PH/19 Change 4.64/PH/36 introduced a bug: when address_retry_include_sender > was true (the default) a successful delivery failed to delete the retry > item, thus causing premature timeout of the address. The bug is now > fixed.
It this fix something the rest of us should be concerned about? That is, is this considered an emergency hotfix we should all install, or does it only affect unusual configurations? -- Dean Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
